Ronnie Coleman vs Arnold...who wins?

physisux

New Member
7 Jun 2011
12
0
1
arnold... he looks much more natural, much more "clean". ronnie looks kinda "artificial". sorry for the harsh words :confused:
 

gosu_smurf

Senior Member
7 Jun 2011
1,419
324
138
Arnold.

His legs look pure wicked. It may not be as huge as ronnie's, but the definitions defintely made up for it. I can't imagine the amount of body fat %. 5%? 3%? I can't seem to see the fats at all! hahaa

One thing I noticed is that ronnie's veins seems really significant. Makes it look a little freaky when it combo with the huge muscle mass.
 

luXy

Well-Known Member
8 Jun 2011
647
88
73
31
Bedok
His legs look pure wicked. It may not be as huge as ronnie's, but the definitions defintely made up for it. I can't imagine the amount of body fat %. 5%? 3%? I can't seem to see the fats at all! hahaa.
His legs look like those on Superman or Batman toy models! Lol!!
 

mika

Member
3 Nov 2011
95
4
8
39
Arnold for me.
It also looks more natural for me and seems he effortlessly show or present his body. I also prefer such kind of tummy than the other one.
 

PWiD

Well-Known Member
20 Jul 2011
291
34
53
Ronnie has a lot more veins popping out. Arnolds belly is kinda sucked in.
That's a method of posing called vacuum.

Both of them are in two different eras. Kind of hard to compare them in such a way. Classic vs extreme physique.