Ronnie Coleman vs Arnold...who wins?

[prosu]

 

[physisux]

arnold... he looks much more natural, much more "clean". ronnie looks kinda "artificial". sorry for the harsh words

 

[gosu_smurf]

Arnold.

His legs look pure wicked. It may not be as huge as ronnie's, but the definitions defintely made up for it. I can't imagine the amount of body fat %. 5%? 3%? I can't seem to see the fats at all! hahaa

One thing I noticed is that ronnie's veins seems really significant. Makes it look a little freaky when it combo with the huge muscle mass.

 

[thecakeisalie]

Ronnie has a lot more veins popping out. Arnolds belly is kinda sucked in.

 

[luXy]

His legs look pure wicked. It may not be as huge as ronnie's, but the definitions defintely made up for it. I can't imagine the amount of body fat %. 5%? 3%? I can't seem to see the fats at all! hahaa.

His legs look like those on Superman or Batman toy models! Lol!!

 

[mika]

Arnold for me.
It also looks more natural for me and seems he effortlessly show or present his body. I also prefer such kind of tummy than the other one.

 

[PWiD]

Ronnie has a lot more veins popping out. Arnolds belly is kinda sucked in.

That's a method of posing called vacuum.

Both of them are in two different eras. Kind of hard to compare them in such a way. Classic vs extreme physique.